Back to Resources

Running a team

4 min read · July 31, 2026

Last verified: July 31, 2026

The One-Page AI Policy

A ready-to-adapt policy for a team of 5 to 50 — ten minutes to customize, one meeting to roll out.

What this is for

You need something in writing before someone on your team pastes a client contract into a free AI tool. This is that document — a real one-page policy you can hand out this week, plus a prompt that adapts it to your specific industry and headcount, and a plan for rolling it out without a two-hour training nobody wanted.

Before you start

  • Know your approved tool list, even a short one (it's fine if it's just "ChatGPT Plus, company account").
  • Know who the actual point of contact is for AI questions — a name, not a department.

The policy — copy this as-is, then customize

COMPANY AI USE POLICY

Purpose: This describes how we use AI tools at [COMPANY NAME], so
everyone works from the same rules instead of guessing.

Approved tools: [LIST YOUR TOOLS, e.g., ChatGPT Plus (company
account), Claude Pro (company account), Perplexity]. Personal/free
accounts on these tools may be used for general research only —
never for anything in the "never paste" list below. New tools need
sign-off from [NAME/ROLE] before use on company work.

Never paste into any AI tool, including approved ones, unless that
tool is contractually confirmed not to train on our data:
- Client names paired with financial, health, or legal details
- Unreleased pricing, financials, or strategy documents
- Employee personal information (SSNs, salaries, home addresses,
  medical information)
- Source code containing API keys, credentials, or secrets
- Anything under an NDA that restricts third-party disclosure

Disclosure: If AI materially shaped a client-facing deliverable
(more than light editing), say so internally when you hand it off,
and use judgment on whether the client needs to know. When in
doubt, disclose — it costs less than being caught not disclosing.

Review requirement: Anything client-facing that touched AI at any
stage (drafting, editing, research, images) gets a human read-through
before it goes out. No AI output ships unreviewed. The reviewer is
the same person who'd be accountable if it were wrong.

Who to ask: Questions about tools, data, or "can I use AI for this"
go to [NAME/ROLE], not to guessing or asking around.

Last updated: [DATE]. This is a living document — see the review
note below.

Customize it with this prompt

Use in ChatGPT or Claude, either one — this is a drafting task, not one requiring live sourcing or code execution.

ROLE: You are a plain-spoken policy editor helping a small business
adapt a generic AI use policy to their specific situation.

CONTEXT: I run a [INDUSTRY, e.g., "10-person accounting firm"] with
[HEADCOUNT] employees. We handle [TYPE OF SENSITIVE DATA, e.g.,
"client tax and financial records"]. Our approved AI tools are
[LIST]. Our point of contact for AI questions is [NAME/ROLE].

Here is our base policy:
[PASTE THE POLICY ABOVE]

CONSTRAINTS: Keep it to one page. Keep the plain, direct tone — no
legal jargon, no hedging language. Add one industry-specific item
to the "never paste" list if our industry has an obvious one I
haven't listed (e.g., health data, financial account numbers,
attorney-client material). Do not add sections beyond what's here.

OUTPUT FORMAT: Return the complete, customized one-page policy,
ready to send to my team as-is.

Where this goes wrong

  • Companies write a policy, send it once by email, and assume it's read. Nobody reads a policy email. Walk through it live, even for ten minutes, or it doesn't exist in practice.
  • The "never paste" list is written too generically to be useful, so people can't tell if their specific situation counts. Add one real example from your own work, not just categories.
  • The policy gets written and never revisited. Tools and risks change every few months; a policy from a year ago is a policy nobody trusts.

Rollout plan

Announce (week 1): Send the policy with one paragraph of context — why now, not because anything went wrong, but so everyone starts from the same rules. Name the point of contact clearly.

Train once (week 1 or 2): One 15-minute meeting or recorded walkthrough. Cover the "never paste" list with one real example and the review requirement. Take questions live — this is where people surface the edge cases the policy didn't anticipate.

Review at 90 days: Revisit the tool list, the "never paste" list, and whether the review requirement is actually happening. Update the "last updated" date and note it in your next team meeting. This isn't a compliance formality — it's how the policy stays believed.

The 2-minute version

Copy the policy above, fill in the brackets, run the customization prompt if your industry needs specifics, send it with a short note, walk through it once live, revisit in 90 days.

This is a starting template, not legal review. Have someone who actually knows your regulatory environment check it before you treat it as your final policy.


Where you stand with AI, in 10 minutes. The free AI Readiness Quiz gives you a personalized roadmap instead of another tool list: genxcelerate.com

Weekly, on Tuesdays. The Gen Xcelerator — practical AI intelligence for people who already know how to do the job. Subscribe free

Experience Is the API. — GenXcelerate

Related resources

The Gen Xcelerator

A new one every Tuesday. Short, useful, and written for people who already know how to run things.

Get the newsletter